Yep, but in a way this may be the best thing. Charles Krauthammer was on with Bret Baier earlier and pointed out that this is not at all good for the WH and their things with let's show the world how great our system is (and whatever the verdict, we're never letting him go). So now it's probably back to military tribunals and Gitmo.
Just so. Now maybe the idiots on the left will wake up and get it. If BO can't close gitmo or deal with these people, then maybe they'll realize that it's more complex than they can grasp, that President Bush did the best thing after all. (yeah, right, I can dream)
I can't begin to tell you how I feel about this. I can't find words strong enough. Maybe "reprehensible" comes close. But the Leftists and the sock-puppet media will talk about how wonderful this is and it is better to let 1000 guilty go than convict an innocent. They make me violently ill. I despise their very existence.
@JCG: I don't dispute that, but they came within a hair's breadth of not convicting him at all. 233 clear-cut counts and they could only convict on one? Too close.
Don't sweat it, Deekaman, BO and the racist loon at the DOJ said, even before the trial, that he was never going to walk, even if the verdict had been not guilty on ALL counts.
That's what I find so freaking jaw-droppingly amazing. Where is the leftie outrage over this? If President Bush said anything like that, they'd be calling for his head. I have zero respect for the radical left; they do not even pretend to adhere to their own crazy ideology. It's disgusting. They're disgusting.
Fuzzy: I have to agree wholeheartedly. Had the Bush administration said anything so outrageous, the cacophony from the Left and the Media (and, rightfully, from the Right) would be deafening. I'm hearing crickets from the Left.
6 comments:
Yep, but in a way this may be the best thing. Charles Krauthammer was on with Bret Baier earlier and pointed out that this is not at all good for the WH and their things with let's show the world how great our system is (and whatever the verdict, we're never letting him go). So now it's probably back to military tribunals and Gitmo.
Just so. Now maybe the idiots on the left will wake up and get it. If BO can't close gitmo or deal with these people, then maybe they'll realize that it's more complex than they can grasp, that President Bush did the best thing after all. (yeah, right, I can dream)
I can't begin to tell you how I feel about this. I can't find words strong enough. Maybe "reprehensible" comes close. But the Leftists and the sock-puppet media will talk about how wonderful this is and it is better to let 1000 guilty go than convict an innocent. They make me violently ill. I despise their very existence.
The man will never get out of jail. So to me it doesn't matter if he was convicted of 1 charge or 1000 charges. As long as he is where he belongs.
@JCG: I don't dispute that, but they came within a hair's breadth of not convicting him at all. 233 clear-cut counts and they could only convict on one? Too close.
Don't sweat it, Deekaman, BO and the racist loon at the DOJ said, even before the trial, that he was never going to walk, even if the verdict had been not guilty on ALL counts.
That's what I find so freaking jaw-droppingly amazing. Where is the leftie outrage over this? If President Bush said anything like that, they'd be calling for his head. I have zero respect for the radical left; they do not even pretend to adhere to their own crazy ideology. It's disgusting. They're disgusting.
Fuzzy: I have to agree wholeheartedly. Had the Bush administration said anything so outrageous, the cacophony from the Left and the Media (and, rightfully, from the Right) would be deafening. I'm hearing crickets from the Left.
Post a Comment