The Beer: I brewed up a Pilsener over the weekend. It will have to lager for an extended period, so I'm figuring about the time it gets warm, the Pils will be ready to drink.
The Bicycle: It appears riding season is soon upon us, with Tuesday and Wednesday temps in the 50's. Yay.
The VRWC: It is a foregone conclusion that there will be a recall election in Wisconsin. It is as nearly forgone that Walker will win, regardless of who the opponent is. Falk will get clobbered. I don't even think the Leftists like her. Barrett thinks he can win, but once it comes out he's been using the Act 10 tools, he's toast.
So what happens if Walker wins? The Left has spend millions upon millions trying to make Wisconsin ungovernable. Street Theater, Occupying and defacing the Capitol, bullying and shouting down legislators, staling the governor, drums and vuvuzelas and 300 paces (approximate distance from the square to the rotunda). They are barbarians.
So, what happens when Walker wins? Permanent occupation? Making Wisconsin ungovernable? Mass sickouts by teachers and government workers? Wildcat strikes? I see the potential for all these and more. The Left sees the potential for their power to slip away. They will stop at nothing. All one needs for a taste is to see what has transpired over one....little...word spoken in satire by Rush Limbaugh.
If you think we aren't next, think again.
Monday, March 5, 2012
Sunday, March 4, 2012
Game On
"Eventually" just showed up.
Napolitano is fired, Brietbart dies, Rush is hushed. On these victories, the Left has begun an all-out offensive against us. Your opinion and faith MUST now coincide with theirs or there will be hell to pay. If you think the Rush Limbaugh thing is the end of it with his apology, think again. The Left has gone into an all-out blitzkrieg against Conservative talk shows, Conservative actors and actresses and Conservative institutions. This may well be our Krystallnacht. (Not that I am comparing Leftists to Nazis. Any comparison is purely your own and/or coincidental).
This is no different from the Nazi takeover of Germany before WWII, it is no different than the Communist takeovers of Russia, China, Venezuela, Nicaragua, Cuba. Bully the opposition into silence. If they can't be bullied, take away their means of support. If that doesn't work, round them up for re-education. If that doesn't work, shoot them. Are you prepared? This will become much worse by the time the general election rolls around. We must push back, we must not be bullied and we must take the fight to them.
Napolitano is fired, Brietbart dies, Rush is hushed. On these victories, the Left has begun an all-out offensive against us. Your opinion and faith MUST now coincide with theirs or there will be hell to pay. If you think the Rush Limbaugh thing is the end of it with his apology, think again. The Left has gone into an all-out blitzkrieg against Conservative talk shows, Conservative actors and actresses and Conservative institutions. This may well be our Krystallnacht. (Not that I am comparing Leftists to Nazis. Any comparison is purely your own and/or coincidental).
This is no different from the Nazi takeover of Germany before WWII, it is no different than the Communist takeovers of Russia, China, Venezuela, Nicaragua, Cuba. Bully the opposition into silence. If they can't be bullied, take away their means of support. If that doesn't work, round them up for re-education. If that doesn't work, shoot them. Are you prepared? This will become much worse by the time the general election rolls around. We must push back, we must not be bullied and we must take the fight to them.
I will no longer be silent in public. I will no longer silently take their abuse heaped upon us.
The Fundamental Hypocrisy of the Left
The Left is a gaggle of "takers" and hypocrites. There is some overlap here, but at its core, this is the Left. The recent hoo-ha over funding of birth control is evidence.
Sandra Fluke testifies before Congress that her Jesuit college or the federal government or someone else should pay for the birth control of all women. God forbid they should pay for it themselves or keep their legs shut. As a consequence of this absurd testimony, the word "slut" was used in reference to her by talk show host Rush Limbaugh. suddenly, the Left changed the subject. Rather than discuss the merits (or lack thereof) of Ms. Fluke's demands, rather than discuss that she was not exactly who she claimed to be and rather than discuss that she is not just a concerned citizen, but rather an activist for the Left, it became about the word.
Now, I will state that I do not know Sandra Fluke...at least not in the Biblical sense. I do not know if she is a slut in sexual terms. But based on her testimony, her activism and her willingness to cover up who she really is, I believe she is a political/ideological slut, willing to do or say anything to advance the agenda.
The Left-wing Extremists are outraged at this portrayal of their newfound heroine and have forced Limbaugh to apologize through their heavy-handed thuggishness against his sponsors. Admittedly, I was disappointed to see him apologize. Their goal is to silence him. But the Professor at Legal Insurrection made an excellent point. By apologizing, the discussion is no longer about the word and can go on about the topic.
But all this shows what hypocrites and bullies the Left wing remains. They said nothing as radical Left wing talk show hosts like Bill Maher referred to Sarah Palin as a "cunt" and Laura Ingraham and a whore.. These characterizations of Conservative women are common with the extreme agenda of the Left. The extremists who rule the Democrat party with an iron fist bully their way to whatever they happen to want. They lie about the agenda, change the subject and cry about the mote in the eye of a Conservative while ignoring the log in their own.
At some point, the bullies will need a "punch in the nose".
Sandra Fluke testifies before Congress that her Jesuit college or the federal government or someone else should pay for the birth control of all women. God forbid they should pay for it themselves or keep their legs shut. As a consequence of this absurd testimony, the word "slut" was used in reference to her by talk show host Rush Limbaugh. suddenly, the Left changed the subject. Rather than discuss the merits (or lack thereof) of Ms. Fluke's demands, rather than discuss that she was not exactly who she claimed to be and rather than discuss that she is not just a concerned citizen, but rather an activist for the Left, it became about the word.
Now, I will state that I do not know Sandra Fluke...at least not in the Biblical sense. I do not know if she is a slut in sexual terms. But based on her testimony, her activism and her willingness to cover up who she really is, I believe she is a political/ideological slut, willing to do or say anything to advance the agenda.
The Left-wing Extremists are outraged at this portrayal of their newfound heroine and have forced Limbaugh to apologize through their heavy-handed thuggishness against his sponsors. Admittedly, I was disappointed to see him apologize. Their goal is to silence him. But the Professor at Legal Insurrection made an excellent point. By apologizing, the discussion is no longer about the word and can go on about the topic.
But all this shows what hypocrites and bullies the Left wing remains. They said nothing as radical Left wing talk show hosts like Bill Maher referred to Sarah Palin as a "cunt" and Laura Ingraham and a whore.. These characterizations of Conservative women are common with the extreme agenda of the Left. The extremists who rule the Democrat party with an iron fist bully their way to whatever they happen to want. They lie about the agenda, change the subject and cry about the mote in the eye of a Conservative while ignoring the log in their own.
At some point, the bullies will need a "punch in the nose".
Friday, February 24, 2012
Monday, February 20, 2012
Pro-Choice
"Pro-Choice" means "pro-abortion". It can be no other way. All other choices have always been in play. When I was younger, I didn't fully understand this. I do now.
Sunday, February 19, 2012
Politico and The Voting Rights Act
The Beer: Brewed up a Cream Ale yesterday and the Fat Tire Clone is kegged. Next weekend I'm thinking I should brew up a Pils.
The Bicycle: Time to get it down and cleaned up. I expect the first ride of the season within the next four weeks.
The VRWC: I don't spend much time at Politico. Never have. But is it just me or are they becoming more and more PuffHo all the time?
Deekawife 3.0 was bugging me about blogging, since I haven't put up anything since Wednesday. So, when I happened across this, I found a good excuse to rant.
The Voting Rights Act, though a necessary evil has been the greatest boon to SoProgs since, well....ever. It has been used to leverage minorities into the Democrat Party by claiming it was the GOP all along who wanted to suppress their vote. Except that it wasn't. The Republicans voted in favor by a far larger margin than the Democrats did. But the Big Lie has been enough to drive minorities (that and government handouts) toward the Democrats and the SoProgs. It is true that laws in southern states were designed to prevent minorities, especially Blacks from voting. But those states were "The Solid South"; at the time solidly Democrat and solidly racist.
Fast forward to 2012. The Voting Rights Act is now used as a political club used to beat states that run solidly Conservative Republican. Why else would voter ID laws in places like South Carolina and Texas be challenged while the intimidation of White Voters in Philadelphia by Black Panthers passes practically without comment by the Administration.
Attorney General Eric Holder claims, "The reality is that — in jurisdictions across the country — both overt and subtle forms of discrimination remain all too common". Then why hasn't Holder prosecuted any violations (At least, I am unable to find any evidence of prosecution)? So, either Holder is lying or he is derelict in his duty? I see no other choice here.
The Politico article only infers, it never states what the real issue here is. I can be a little more succinct. SoProgs need fraud to win. It becomes more apparent here in Wisconsin every day. If it were not so, the cacophony against voter ID would not exist. Asking someone to identify themselves is ubiquitous in American society. One cannot take part in day-to-day life without identification. Asking someone to prove that they are eligible to vote in a certain location by showing identification in no way disenfranchises anyone. It is just another Big Lie. In fact it does quite the opposite. One person voting illegally disenfranchises everyone. Without Voter ID, it is a simple thing for me to walk into your polling place early in the morning, claim to be you, vote and walk out. when you come in later in the day and find "you" have already voted, you have no recourse. None. You are turned away. Is that really what you want?
The Voting Rights Act is outdated. Jim Crow is extinct and is never coming back. The Act is only used to ensure states cannot make common sense changes to voting laws (like Voter ID) and keep minorities on the Democrat/SoProg Plantation.
The Bicycle: Time to get it down and cleaned up. I expect the first ride of the season within the next four weeks.
The VRWC: I don't spend much time at Politico. Never have. But is it just me or are they becoming more and more PuffHo all the time?
Deekawife 3.0 was bugging me about blogging, since I haven't put up anything since Wednesday. So, when I happened across this, I found a good excuse to rant.
The Voting Rights Act, though a necessary evil has been the greatest boon to SoProgs since, well....ever. It has been used to leverage minorities into the Democrat Party by claiming it was the GOP all along who wanted to suppress their vote. Except that it wasn't. The Republicans voted in favor by a far larger margin than the Democrats did. But the Big Lie has been enough to drive minorities (that and government handouts) toward the Democrats and the SoProgs. It is true that laws in southern states were designed to prevent minorities, especially Blacks from voting. But those states were "The Solid South"; at the time solidly Democrat and solidly racist.
Fast forward to 2012. The Voting Rights Act is now used as a political club used to beat states that run solidly Conservative Republican. Why else would voter ID laws in places like South Carolina and Texas be challenged while the intimidation of White Voters in Philadelphia by Black Panthers passes practically without comment by the Administration.
Attorney General Eric Holder claims, "The reality is that — in jurisdictions across the country — both overt and subtle forms of discrimination remain all too common". Then why hasn't Holder prosecuted any violations (At least, I am unable to find any evidence of prosecution)? So, either Holder is lying or he is derelict in his duty? I see no other choice here.
The Politico article only infers, it never states what the real issue here is. I can be a little more succinct. SoProgs need fraud to win. It becomes more apparent here in Wisconsin every day. If it were not so, the cacophony against voter ID would not exist. Asking someone to identify themselves is ubiquitous in American society. One cannot take part in day-to-day life without identification. Asking someone to prove that they are eligible to vote in a certain location by showing identification in no way disenfranchises anyone. It is just another Big Lie. In fact it does quite the opposite. One person voting illegally disenfranchises everyone. Without Voter ID, it is a simple thing for me to walk into your polling place early in the morning, claim to be you, vote and walk out. when you come in later in the day and find "you" have already voted, you have no recourse. None. You are turned away. Is that really what you want?
The Voting Rights Act is outdated. Jim Crow is extinct and is never coming back. The Act is only used to ensure states cannot make common sense changes to voting laws (like Voter ID) and keep minorities on the Democrat/SoProg Plantation.
Wednesday, February 15, 2012
Save the Watch!
Normally, when the BS gets deep, you check the bottom of your shoes to find that smell. But this survey is so deep in "what you're steppin' in", you feel the need to get your watch as far above your head as possible. You know it's REALLY deep. Conservative friend Bob breaks it down:
From his notes:
1. Here is a very good question on this survey. (p. 25) (Paraphrase) Do you consider yourself a Born-again Christian? 66% say No.
The next question. What is your religious preference?
52% Protestant
19% Catholic
15% NONE
Almost as many "athiests" as Catholics taking this survey, and this is not a true survey of Catholics (Which is the impression that the story gives).
And no breakdown of the questions by religious preference. For example, How did Catholics, as a group, answer this question? Or Protestants? We do not know.
The question asked also did not pertain to religious freedom or first amendment rights, it was strictly about birth control.
There is also a question about who these respondants voted in '08. 41% Obama to 30% McCain. (This should really raise red flags, Obama did not beat McCain by 11 percentage points in '08). (Page 24)
2. On the same page (page 24), 68% of those respondents are not supporters of the Tea Party (Which is far above the national average). This is a huge red flag. This survey really needs some scrutiny when you look at it all, the demographics make this survey very questionable.
3. And on page 27 (contrary to what it says on the cover of the survey.)
34% democrat
27% Republican
32% Independent.
This survey is weighted heavily democratic.
Bob nails this when he says we shouldn't just take this as media "business as usual". We should be outraged at this kind of bias and even more outraged that The President of the United States of America has so little regard for the Constitution of the United States.
From his notes:
1. Here is a very good question on this survey. (p. 25) (Paraphrase) Do you consider yourself a Born-again Christian? 66% say No.
The next question. What is your religious preference?
52% Protestant
19% Catholic
15% NONE
Almost as many "athiests" as Catholics taking this survey, and this is not a true survey of Catholics (Which is the impression that the story gives).
And no breakdown of the questions by religious preference. For example, How did Catholics, as a group, answer this question? Or Protestants? We do not know.
The question asked also did not pertain to religious freedom or first amendment rights, it was strictly about birth control.
There is also a question about who these respondants voted in '08. 41% Obama to 30% McCain. (This should really raise red flags, Obama did not beat McCain by 11 percentage points in '08). (Page 24)
2. On the same page (page 24), 68% of those respondents are not supporters of the Tea Party (Which is far above the national average). This is a huge red flag. This survey really needs some scrutiny when you look at it all, the demographics make this survey very questionable.
3. And on page 27 (contrary to what it says on the cover of the survey.)
34% democrat
27% Republican
32% Independent.
This survey is weighted heavily democratic.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)