Apparently not. Now he claims Romney has a disdain for "the workers". There's that term again, "the workers".
Apparently, unless you are a minimum wage earner or a union member, you don't "work" for a living. The term "worker" is used in Communist Lexicon to differentiate between the "Proletariat" and the "Bourgeoisie". Is it any surprise it has become a common term for the Leftists in this country.
Krugman takes Romney's comments not only out-of-context, but out of meaning.
For the fact is that the modern Republican Party just doesn’t have much respect for people who work for other people, no matter how faithfully and well they do their jobs. All the party’s affection is reserved for “job creators,” a k a employers and investors. Leading figures in the party find it hard even to pretend to have any regard for ordinary working families — who, it goes without saying, make up the vast majority of Americans.
This is just absurd. Krugman is a shill for the Left and, in particular this administration and has shown himself willing to say anything to advance the cause. Any focus on "job creators" only helps Krugman's "workers". There's been no help for "workers" from the Obama Administration. We continue mired in 8% unemployment and twice that many are actually out of work. Housing still sucks and the latest anemic jobs report shows fewer than 100,000 jobs added again.
So I call "bullshit" on Krugman. Once again, he shills for a failed administration by demonizing the challenger. He's got nothin'. For a Nobel, he's not all that smart.