Wednesday, September 29, 2010

Sure, Tom

Another underestimation.

No plan? Once we eradicate the plague of Progressivism, we will move forward. And the progressives have been successful how? By giving away taxpayer money in the form of welfare, food stamps, medicare, medicaid, Obamacare? Stealing from the Social Security Trust Fund?

Pretty clear to me what doesn't work. We would maintain the status quo why?

Tom Friedman can Bite Me.

Milwaukee Poverty

From the Department of Tourism: "Milwaukee - We're the new Detroit".

I predicted this several years ago. But you will have to search these pages; I'm not feeling up to it today.

Tuesday, September 28, 2010

David Olson For Assembly

I know David quite well. He was my intern a couple years ago. He will always do what is right, not what is expedient. If you live in his district, get out and help him.

Grayson: Despicable Liar

What Alan Grayson claims:




What Webster actually said:





Alan Grayson is a despicable excuse for a human being.

Sunday, September 26, 2010

War, It Is

Matthew Iglesias wants Leftists to "Go to War" over healthcare. He wants to do it for the children.

Just another story about the perverse way American health care is financed. If you're old, you're taken care of by Medicare. If you're very poor, you're taken care of by Medicaid. If you're middle class, however, you're stuck with a system that works great—unless you get sick or lose your job. It's a system that makes a joke of the idea of insurance, which is precisely that it's supposed to come rescue people who suffer bad luck.

It's always the same argument: People just suffer from bad luck, so the government has to take care of them, provide a "social safety net". The children suffer unnecessarily. Medicare and Medicaid exist so the government should do more of the same.

In a word, "NO". The high cost of healthcare is attributable, in part anyway to government. Medicare and Medicaid do not fully reimburse costs. Hospitals are required to treat patients via the ER regardless of ability to pay. Burdensome paperwork requires an army of bureaucrats (insurance paperwork is no less burdensome, but that, too stems from Federal requirements).

I know...I don't care about the poor, the children, the sick and the old.....or polar bears, puppies and butterflies. Actually, I do care. But I care more about my children and grandchildren, my stepfather, my in-laws, and my 92 year-old neighbor. Government has shown their inability to make healthcare more affordable. They need to get out of the business.

Here's the deal: If you are in Medicare or older than, say....55, you will continue to have fully funded Medicare if you like. If you are younger than 55, you will not have a Medicare option. Medicaid is phased out over 10 years. "Catastrophic Care" insurance made available through insurers (and it already exists) is a low-cost way of making sure healthcare is available when needed. Congress enacts tort reform. Done. See that was easy.

War? The Left will lose. They are bullies who run away when punched in the nose.

Ponzi and SSI

PolitiFact really blew this one.

Of COURSE Social Security is a Ponzi scheme. From the PolitiFact story:

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission offers a simple definition: "A Ponzi scheme is an investment fraud that involves the payment of purported returns to existing investors from funds contributed by new investors."

Social Security has been raided by both parties to make the deficit look better for about 30 years now.

On one level, that sounds like Social Security, which uses taxes on today’s wage earners to fund the retirement checks of millions of Americans. But remember: The SEC also notes that a Ponzi is an "investment fraud."

Are funds not "invested" with the government? And here is Johnson's mistake:

Johnson’s campaign manager, Juston Johnson, said neither he nor his boss is "saying the Social Security Administration is a fraud" -- pointing out the candidate wants to fix the system. Asked why the candidate used Madoff’s name, if it wasn’t meant to imply criminal wrongdoing, the spokesman declined to answer.

I don't think SSA itself is fraudulent, but the American people have certainly been defrauded. Criminally. By the Federal Government. Johnson should say so. Funds have been "invested" with the government, used for other purposes BY the government and no longer occupy the account. That's fraud.