tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7113721142630525991.post6501031454533968993..comments2023-08-07T04:03:13.829-05:00Comments on Beer, Bicycles and the VRWC: "Net Neutrality"Beer, Bicycles and the VRWChttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08976779901265528597noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7113721142630525991.post-86513101330341974392010-03-14T15:37:39.467-05:002010-03-14T15:37:39.467-05:00I'll change ISPs. I don't need the govern...I'll change ISPs. I don't need the government and their potential for abuse to protect me.<br /><br />And I ask the same question I asked before.....are you ok with this if it's Bush? Or for that matter...yes just assume this administration has no nefarious intent (which I doubt), what about the next? Or the next? Or the one after that.<br /><br />Governments that accumulate power eventually use it against their own citizens. It has always happened, it will always happen.Beer, Bicycles and the VRWChttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08976779901265528597noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7113721142630525991.post-54896185351475596782010-03-14T13:18:35.310-05:002010-03-14T13:18:35.310-05:00So, you wouldn't mind your ISP blocking your a...So, you wouldn't mind your ISP blocking your access to espn.com until Disney/ABC ponies up more money per page view? It will be a lot like the cable TV disputes between Charter and the Big 10 Network (and the more recent one between Cablevision and ABC that threatened to blackout the Academy Awards in much of the New York market). Right now, ISPs are not allowed to block your access to their competitors' content. The net neutrality movement seeks to keep that status quo.Ordinary Jillhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05967266466238236424noreply@blogger.com